Via Brera 6
20121 Milan
Italy
Tel: +39 02 8646 3313
Fax: +39 02 8646 3892
Email: info@trevisancuonzo.com
Website: www.trevisancuonzo.com
Areas of specialization
Patents
Trade marks
Designs
Copyright
Pharmaceuticals
Biotechnology
Anti-counterfeiting
Unfair competition
Internet
Information technology
EEC and Italian antitrust
Commercial
Franchising
Licensing
Technology transfer
Merchandising
Product liability
Entertainment and media
Company law
Mergers and acquisitions
Telecommunications
For further information please contact IP partners
Luca Trevisan
Gabriel Cuonzo
Julia Holden
Protecting the intangible assets of your business
Trevisan & Cuonzo, established in 1993, is one of the leading Italian law firms and its clients include many of the most technologically advanced and innovative businesses in the world. The firm offers a complete range of commercial services and specialises in a wide range of industrial sectors including electronics, chemical, automotive, food, energy, life sciences, telecommunications, media and information technology.
The firm works closely with patent agents and other technical experts both in the preparation of cases and in its IP advisory practice. It has a dedicated trade mark and design practice trading as Intellectual Property & Business Consulting (IP&B). The firm is active in taking forward traditional trade mark and copyright principles into the realm of digital technology.
Trevisan & Cuonzo has an international client base with a keen understanding of the approach and focus of US, European, Australian and Canadian businesses. It is active in all spheres of industry and works with multinational corporations, medium-sized companies, small businesses, non-profit organizations and private clients.
The partnership is supported by Italian, German and UK admitted lawyers and three external consultants.
Notable cases handled by Trevisan & Cuonzo include
AGA Medical Corporation v Occultech GmbH; Orient Express v Cipriani; Nokia v Italian Government and Italian Collecting Society; Gates v Dayco; TRW v JTEK